Showing posts with label wind power. Show all posts
Showing posts with label wind power. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 29, 2026

Spain: A Comeback for Wood and Pellet Heating

World events are shaping remote, rural villages

recently took a trip to Spain with my wife to walk the Camino Primitivo, a Christian pilgrim route connecting small towns in the far northwest corner of the country. I wasn’t looking for wood or pellet stoves—but there were so many that I couldn’t help but start paying attention, given my day job. In one town, Tineo, nearly every store and restaurant had a pellet stove, and they all looked brand new.

As I started talking to people and doing a bit of reading, an interesting story emerged. The invasion of Ukraine sent shockwaves through European energy markets that are still reverberating today. Then came the bombing of Iran and closure of the Straits of Hormuz. The result: Spain is now offering more incentives for homes and businesses to switch to pellet stoves and boilers.

Along the Camino, pellet stoves showed up everywhere, each in its own context. In one hotel lobby, a stove had a large handwritten note: “Do not touch.” In a general store, one was surrounded by a small safety fence. In an upscale eatery, the pellet stove was part of a carefully curated retro aesthetic. They clearly add a sense of coziness—but like everywhere else, the real driver is economics.

We saw several Italian models, but the most common seemed to be made in Galicia in Northwest Spain by Ecoforest. One popular model, the Bolonia, is strikingly slim—designed to fit even in a hallway. Ecoforest also makes heat pumps, and with smart thermostat software, the two types of heaters can switch back and forth depending on outdoor temperatures and heating needs.

In Spain, incentives are often targeted at towns with fewer than 5,000 residents, part of a broader effort to combat rural depopulation and support areas without access to natural gas networks. These programs align with European Union funding frameworks aimed at sparsely populated and economically disadvantaged regions, with some funding coming directly from the EU.

Incentives are handled regionally, not nationally, and usually involve documentation from both a qualified installer and a local permit.  When an existing stove is simply swapped out for a new one, there is less paperwork to access incentives, but DIY installs are rare whether incentives are involved or not. Professional installation is required and stoves must be registered with the local authority.  The trail we walked went through two regions - Galicia and Asturias - and both have generous subsidies but Galicia's  are even more generous leading to a greater use of pellet heating.  In some provinces, subsidies are more if you are reducing reliance on coal or oil, and less for electricity. In others, household income may have more of an impact, and residing in a rural area or small town almost always increases the amount. Both equipment cost and installation are covered with total costs usually coming to 3,000 - 5,000 Euros ($3,500 0 $5,800 US). and the incentive usually between 30 - 50%.

Cordwood heating

Cordwood heating is still more common than pellet heating, though it receives few if any incentives. A few things stood out to me. Firewood lengths were often surprisingly short—frequently just 8–10 inches, and rarely more than 14–16 inches. Wood was almost always stored under a roof, and much of it looked like it had been seasoning for several years.

That suggested a mature, long-standing wood heating culture where the importance of properly dried wood is well understood. Interestingly, the shorter log lengths didn’t seem tied to stove size. Many older rural stoves are sized more like U.S. stoves and bear little resemblance to the more modern, sleek, vertically oriented European models.

One rural restaurant along the trail—also offering a few guest rooms—used a wood-fired cookstove that piped hot water upstairs. While I was there, the good-natured cook was cursing the stove, which had just started leaking. It was a reminder that these hot water systems can lead, and also they ca be fixed by the owner. 

Spain, like the rest of Europe, has at least a 3,000-year head start on wood heating and forest harvesting. We saw countless stone homes that looked 500 years old, many with equally old chimneys still in use. That long history is also visible in the landscape: massive trees continue to be coppiced, a practice where branches are cut regularly for fuel and allowed to regrow—a system still actively used today.

Heavy deforestation began during Roman times about 2,000 years ago and peaked between 1850 and 1920, much like in the United States. But the legacy of that history feels more visible in Spain. Unlike the U.S., where large natural forests remain, many of the forests we saw appeared to be plantations, and not always managed sustainably.

As in the U.S., most wood demand is driven by construction, not firewood. Firewood use is relatively small by comparison.

National heating trends

Reliable data on how many Spanish homes use wood or pellet heating is hard to pin down, but most estimates suggest that 15–20% of homes use wood or pellets as a primary or secondary heating source. Up to 5% may rely on it as their primary fuel.

Spain is less densely populated than countries like France, Germany, or Italy, but it is also warmer, and wood and pellet heating are less established. Unlike Austria, France, Germany, and Italy, Spain has not historically provided strong incentives for pellet stoves and boilers—though that is now changing.

Global energy disruptions are shifting the equation. Locally sourced, renewable energy is becoming more attractive compared to fossil fuels that must travel long distances. This provides not only more stable prices, but a healthy diversity of local sources of electricity.

Spain’s population is about 49 million—roughly 10 million more than California—and rural depopulation is a significant issue. Energy policy is increasingly being used as a tool to support small-town economies.

Most of Spain has relatively mild winters, and about 30% of homes lack central heating. As in Italy, this makes pellet stoves a practical option for  heating the core of the house rather than whole-home systems. In the colder, mountainous northern regions—which are also more forested—winters are harsher, and in some areas up to a third of homes still use wood or pellets.

Spain produces, exports and imports wood pellets which are almost entirely used for small and large heating systems. Many pellet plants are co-located with sawmills or carpentry shops. In some regions, biomass boilers also burn olive pits, nut shells, and, to a lesser extent, sunflower husks. Most pellet production happens in rural areas, so incentives for pellet heating also function as support for local businesses.

Electric rates and pellet heating

One newer incentive for pellet stoves comes from electricity pricing. Under Spain’s tariff structure, electricity is most expensive during peak hours—typically 10am–2pm and 6pm–10pm on weekdays. Heat pumps are very popular, so this creates an opportunity: households can rely more on pellet stoves during those expensive hours and when temperatures drop below freezing.

At the same time, broader trends are shifting. Since 2022, electricity prices in Spain and much of Europe have stabilized or declined, while pellet prices have risen.

Where we were hiking, in the mountainous northwest, wind turbines were everywhere. The expansion of wind energy there—and solar in the south—has helped bring electricity prices down. As a result, Spain now has some of the lowest electricity rates in Europe.

 

Conclusion

If you enjoy hiking, I highly recommend the Camino Primitivo—or any of the caminos in Spain. You pass

through stunning countryside and small towns, stay in affordable local inns, and can even have your luggage transported each day between accommodations.

Along the way, you don’t just see beautiful landscapes—you also witness thousands of years of human history, including the evolution of how people heat their homes. And that history is still unfolding, as Spain begins to embrace a new generation of pellet heating.


Further reading

 

Spanish Energy Efficiency Grants in 2025

How Spaniards Can Get a Subsidy to Replace an Old Boiler

Subsidies to fund the energy transition

USDA Spanish Wood Pellet Market Outlook 2023

Rules for Wood Burners in Spain

Spain Sees Increase in Pellet Fuel Market

Ecoforest celebrates 30 years of innovation in sustainable HVAC equipment

 


Wednesday, November 10, 2010

AGH Board Members Detail Home’s Carbon Footprint

To understand carbon impacts of residential heat, it helps to get get personal. Three Alliance for Green Heat (AGH) board members and one AGH supporter - Jon Stimling, John Ackerly, Josh Elmore and Peter Caldwell - calculated the carbon footprint of their homes in order to better understand home heating carbon impacts. Each household employs at least one form of renewable energy. The four individuals emitted between .92 and 3.8 metric tons of carbon per year to heat their homes, which is well below the national average and even further below their respective state averages. 

Postscript: Ten years later, one Board member is nearly fossil fuel free in his house and cars.  And it was easier than many people may expect.

The lower-than-average emissions are due in part to the fact that each household uses wood or pellet stoves to provide some portion of their heating needs. The calculations were reached using the carbon calculator website; www.carbonfootprint.com, a well regarded program that assigns .18 metric tons of carbon for a ton of wood pellets or a cord of wood. The average American home produces about 12 tons of carbon a year, according to most authorities and 40 to 60% of that on average is used for heating.

The EPA estimates approximately 4 metric tons of carbon dioxide (CO2) per person per year (about 17% of total U.S. emissions) are emitted from people's homes. The individuals featured here all have household footprints of 3 to 7 metric tons, but if calculated using the EPA per capita average, these homes would emit 8 to 20 tons metric tons. The home with the lowest carbon impact from heat has a pellet furnace that can meet 100% of the home’s heating needs. One Board member has solar panels, which covers 100% of his electric load and another buys 100% wind power. Some variance in CO2 output can be attributed to how electricity is generated in each household’s particular state.



House #1: 
A 1,900 square foot home occupied by four people in Maryland has a total average output of 6.95 metric tons of CO2 a year. After purchasing 100% wind power, the footprint drops to 2.85. Natural gas, used as a backup heating fuel, is the largest contributor, totaling 2.49 metric tons of CO2 a year. The combustion of 2 cords of wood in an EPA certified LOPI Patriot circa 1995 accounts for the other .37 metric tons. The wood is obtained from the urban wood waste stream through local tree services working in the neighborhood.

Footprint
Metric tons of C02
Total Household
2.85
Total W/ Electricity
6.95
Total Heating Only
2.23
Natural Gas
2.49
Wood Cords
.37
Size of House
1900 Sq/ft
Number of Occupants
4

House #2:
A 1,800 square foot home occupied by five people in Colorado. This household emits 3.08 metric tons of CO2 a year on average. The largest contributor to this impact is due to the reliance on propane as a back up heating fuel. It is 2.90 metric tons of the total emissions. The remaining .18 metric tons of CO2 is attributed to the single cord of wood burned per year in an EPA certified 2002 Jotul. The wood is either self harvested or purchased from people hired to thin local forest for fire suppression. 100 percent of electricity is from solar panels installed near the house.

Footprint
Metric tons of C02
Total Household
3.08
Total Heating Only
2.36
Propane
2.90
Wood Cords
.18
Size of House
1800 Sq/ft
Number of Occupants
5

House #3:
A 2,650 square foot home in upstate New York occupied by two people. The household’s total CO2 footprint is 7.59 metric tons a year. This result is a combination of the home’s electricity consumption (9,733 kwh/yr), which contributes 3.79 metric tons of CO2 to the total, and heating oil (back-up fuel) which is responsible for 2.52 metric tons of CO2 a year. Finally, the combustion of 7 cords of wood a year in a Vermont Castings stove results in 1.29 metric tons of CO2 being released. The wood is self harvested and split by hand.

Footprint
Metric tons of C02
Total Household
7.59
Total Heating Only
3.81
Heating Oil
2.52
Wood Cords
1.29
Size of House
2650 Sq/ft
Number of Occupants
2
House #4:
A four person 2,500 square foot household in New Hampshire emits 7.02 metric tons of CO2 a year. The largest contributor to this total was electricity consumption (15,000 kwh/yr on average), which resulted in 4.65 metric tons of CO2 being released. Propane for cooking and hot water contributed 1.45 metric tons to the total. With the remaining .92 metric tons released through the combustion of 5 tons of wood pellets in a Harman PF100 furnace each year.

Footprint
Metric tons of C02
Total Household
7.02
Total Heating Only
.92
Propane
1.45
Wood Pellets
.92
Size of House
2500 Sq/ft
Number of Occupants
4

These four households demonstrate the wide array of energy saving measures and methods to offset CO2. There is no blanket, cure-all strategy to reduce fossil fuel consumption, however this group shows how relatively small measures like running a wood stove can help to decrease heavy CO2 emissions. Everyone in the thermal biomass or energy efficiency sector should consider doing their household carbon footprint as well as getting a home energy audit to get a more tangible understanding of these issues. Understanding your carbon footprint in comparison with other Americans is also useful. Finally, understanding the potential of strategies to offset CO2 from fossil fuels, like using a modern wood or pellet stove in your home, is the building block for appreciating how we as a society can intelligently leverage this technology.