Results of the 2018 Wood Stove Design Challenge

 By John Ackerly

The first day of testing, showing Ben Myren Prof.
Phil Hopke and Rebecca Trojanowski.
Photo: Kittner/BNL.

Conducting rigorous and transparent field testing of thirteen stoves in five days is a feat that is unheard of in the wood stove community.  The goals were also unique: fairly test stoves against one another with cordwood; help each team to improve their units and help educate a wider public about novel stove technologies that challenge how we think about the traditional, manually operated EPA certified wood stove.

The 2018 Wood Stove Design Challenge took place from Nov. 9 - 13, featuring 10 stoves in competition and 3 showcase stoves. The stoves were selected and judged by members of the

Large screen monitors provided real time data during
a test run of the Integrated Duty Cycle fueling
protocol under development. Photo: Kittner/BNL

Organizing Committee.  The Alliance for Green Heat (AGH) was the principal architect, organizer and host of the event.  Each of the 10 competition stoves received a $10,000 grant made possible by the DOE's Bioenergy Technology Office.

The Wittus team from New York
and Germany. Photo: Kittner/BNL

In the automation stove category, there were three market ready stoves that successfully went through a rigorous fueling protocol and proved that they could burn relatively cleanly and efficiently even when an operator tried to turn down the heat setting too far and at the wrong times.  An SBI stove and the VcV stove that had been in development for many years showed the value of multi-year R&D and testing, resulting in stoves that may only cost $500 more than a similar,

Staffers from EPA, DOE, USDA and Congressional
offices were able to learn about stove testing and
 engage with teams and judges. Photo: AGH

  

non-automated version.  To us, this is a major breakthrough and stoves like these should show a path to far cleaner cord wood heating in America.  

The SBI team. Photo: Kittner/BNL

The other automated stove was a German-American unit that heated water, made electricity and provided a living room fire experience with a downdraft flame into a lower chamber. While this was not an affordable stove to most Americans, it could have a reasonable pay-back over a number of years, depending on the users cord wood price.  This stove impressed both the Brookhaven National Lab and the Masonry Heater Association testing teams with ultra-low carbon monoxide numbers in the single digits under some conditions, and ultra-high efficiency.  

Ben Myren, one of the top wood stove testing experts
in the US, talking with Larry Brockman of the EPA's
BurnWise program.  Photo: Kittner/BNL

Automated stoves are regarded as one of the best, and only ways to help ensure that manually operated EPA certified stoves perform well not just in the testing lab, but in the homes of consumers.  For automated stoves to start gaining a foothold in the market federal, state and local government recognition and support will be required.

An automated pellet boiler by Maine Energy Systems capped with a Stirling Engine was the most

A Tesla owned by Osprey Foundation head, Bill Clarke,
 being charged by Maine Energy System pellet 
boilers with a Stirling engine. Photo: Kittner/BNL

futuristic of the entries, especially since it was charging a Tesla car in front of the tent. This compact unit could heat a business or multi-family dwelling and provide up to 5 kW of electricity.  

The five testing teams used different equipment
to gather a variety of data. Photo: Kittner/BNL

In the thermoelectric category, the judges concluded that “the most innovative thing is that almost all teams used commercially available thermoelectric modules and showed that it is feasible to generate useful electrical energy without sacrificing the energy efficiency or impeding the heat quality of

This is a Swiss-made electrostatic precipitator for
residential wood stoves that reduced PM by 50 -
90% in our testing.

the wood stove.  Most designs returned the waste heat after electricity generation into useful radiant heat into the room to increase efficiency.  These designs prove that the woodstoves is a good potential commercial opportunity for thermoelectrics to generate useful electrical energy and also increase their commercial appeal for consumers.”

It was clear that stoves or boilers with Thermoelectric Generators (TEG) could produce 100 to 250 watts of power. While this is a relatively modest amount of electricity, larger automated stoves or boilers operating 15 to 20 hours per day may help supplement limited solar power output during winter months. 

Fred Legget of Vulcan Energy 
with a TEG adapted to a Wiseway.
Photo: Kittner/BNL

The George Washington University, Unforgettable Fire and ASAT teams all successfully used off the shelf technology, while TEG expert Fred Leavitt of Vulcan Energy used commercially available TEGs by Hi-Z, and adapted the gravity fed Wiseway pellet stove to get a more steady 130 watt output. 

The Wittus cord wood stove was by far the most market ready and was able to make 250 watts, and it peaked at over 300 when using low moisture pressed wood logs.  Ken Adler, AGH’s Program Director of Thermoelectrics, coordinated the thermoelectric side of the competition and the thermoelectric testing.

University teams have been a key part of the Design
Challenge with SUNY Stony Brook competing this year.

Scoring was done using a numeric rubric based mostly on data produced by the testing equipment but judges did have discretion to award some points based on their subjective assessment in several areas.  Judges assessed automated stoves by these criteria and thermoelectric stoves by these.

And the awards goes to …

The Wittus team won both first prizes.
Photo: Kittner/BNL

·     * First Prize for automated stoves: Wittus.  Great performance on particulate matter, CO, efficiency and safety.

·     Second prize for automated stoves: SBI. A fully automated non-catalytic stove using only 2 sensors that may only cost $500 more than if it were non-automated.

·     * First prize for thermoelectric stoves: Wittus - again;  The highest electric output of up to 250 watts, and an integrated design that can maintain stable electric output.

·     * Second prize for thermoelectric: Vulcan Energy, using the Wiseway pellet stove that produced more than 100 watts and good PM reduction.

Stove testers Tom Butcher, Jake Lindbeg, Rebecca 
Trojanowski Photo: Kittner/BNL

·     Innovation prize: SBI, for simplicity.  The use of only one thermocouple and a sensor on the door, enabled the designers to regulate the stove despite attempts by the testers to turn the heat demand down and make it perform poorly. 

·     * The People’s Choice Award: 509 Fabrications.  Despite being a new, small company without an extensive social media network, the 509 Fabrications pressed log stove was a consumer favorite, garnering more votes than any other stove. 

The MHA testing crew: Ron Pihl, Jim 
Schales, Norbert Senf, Mark Seymour 
and Boris Kukojl. Photo: MHA

Unique and rigorous testing

The 2018 Wood Stove Design Challenge pushed the limits of rigorous wood stove testing both in terms of the amount and variety of technology used, and the fueling protocol, which is far more rigorous than any standard fueling protocol.   More details about this will be forthcoming.  Data produced by this event will show the extent to which automated stoves can navigate fueling protocols where testers try to make stoves go into smolder mode, to see if the automation is robust enough to avoid that.  Data is also more valuable for understanding real world venting conditions, as EPA approved test labs terminate in a warm indoor space, not the colder outdoors.  

Real time emission displays allowed testers teams
and judges to learn more about performance patterns.
This shows exceptional  CO and stack temps on the
Wittus. Photo: Senf

Between Brookhaven National Lab and the Masonry Heater Association, we had up to 5 separate testing teams, allowing many stoves to be tested at once.  We

Jonathan Male, head of DOE's Bioenergy
Technologies Office introducing the awards
Photo: Kittner/BNL

also wanted to have ensure that the Brookhaven and MHA teams could  periodically test the same stove at the same time.  Norbert Senf of the MHA had worked for months to automate the Condar, and the new Condar controls worked very  well, with minimal glitches. They did three runs simultaneously with Brookhaven National Laboratory who used a diluter and Testo 380. Comparisons of the two approaches will be published at some point.

Air quality testing during the Design Challenge

During the Challenge, we monitored indoor and outdoor air quality to get some sense of the impact

Tinted stove pipe donated by Olympia Chimney, 
showing mostly invisible smoke during the event
Photo: Kittner/BNL

from 9 – 13 wood and pellet stoves operating under one roof.  We used a Thermo Scientific pDR-1500 Aerosol Monitor, an Speck indoor PM monitor and a Purple Air PA-II - SD monitor.  Results were mixed, with most indoor readings between 20 - 35 micrograms per cubic meter, but with far higher spikes. The EPA short term PM standard is 35 micrograms per cubic meter.  Outdoor numbers were usually around

Les Otten, right, with Maine Energy Systems
Okofen Pelletmatic E-max CHP unit. Photo: MYSys

10 micrograms per cubic meter. Often the Speck showed  moderate to elevated inside the tent, but on several occasions, prototype stoves released excessive smoke into the tent – and outside of it.  We will issue a more detailed report on this. 

A note of gratitude

Julie Tucker of the USDA Forest Service, with
DOE's Jonathan Male and  AGH's John Ackerly
Photo: Kittner/BNL

 The Wood Stove Design Challenge is a collaborative process involving three major donors - the Department of Energy's Bioenergy Technology Office, New York State Energy Research and Development Authority and Osprey Foundation and scores of in-kind and volunteer partners.  Olympia Chimney and Masonry Heater Association were key in-kind partners, along contributions by West Penn Power

Dusty Henderson with the 509
Fabrications pressed wood log stove
that won the People's Choice Award. 

Sustainable Energy Fund, HPBA, Schott-Robax, Lignetics, Chimney Safety Institute of America, Society for American Foresters, National Fireplace Institute, Catalytic Hearth Coalition, Biolite local sweeps and installers and others were key in enabling the event to occur.  

Unless otherwise noted, photos taken by Sam Kittner and made possible by funding from Brookhaven National Lab and can be used freely by all, with attribution to "Sam Kittner for Brookhaven National Lab."  Photos attributed to AGH can also be used freely and attributed to "Alliance for Green Heat."

The GW University Team. Photo: Kittner/BNL

The innovative rocket stove entry from
ASAT being tested by Ben Myren
Photo: Norbert Senf

Our tent was right between the Capitol and the Washington Monument.
Photo: Kittner/BNL 

Photo: Kittner/BNL

Masonry Heaters and the NSPS

By Norbert Senf,
Chair of Masonry Heater Association Technical Committee,

and member of the Board of Advisors of the Alliance for Green Heat

EPA has released the long awaited new version of their “New Source Performance Standard”, which now includes masonry heaters in the section “RRRR”.  In the last edition of this Standard, released in 1988, masonry heaters were exempted as “inherently clean burning”.

Norbert Senf lives in Quebec
and has built masonry heaters
for more than 30 years.

The Masonry Heater Association (MHA) technical committee has worked very hard to produce written comments and recommendations to the Proposed Standard (P.S.).

The draft NSPS proposes an emissions limit of 0.32 lb/MMBtu for particulates for masonry heaters. HPBA is opposed to a lb/MMBtu limit, and is advocating for g/kg. In g/kg terms, that would be about 1.8 g/kg, assuming 70% efficiency. HPBA cites the fact that lb/MMBtu requires an efficiency number, and that there is no EPA recognized efficiency test method for masonry heaters.

The MHA tech committee feels that lb/MMBtu will eventually be a better way to compare heating appliances, since it takes efficiency into account and avoids having to make the distinction between g/kg for heat storing appliances and g/hr for continuous burn stoves. To that end, MHA is conducting testing to see if the CSA B-415 efficiency method can be adapted to masonry heaters. However at this point we will support the HPBA position.

Two tech committee members are currently conducting testing on the Austrian Eco- firebox air design, which was presented at the MHA annual meeting in 2013. We are measuring repeatable particulate (PM) numbers substantially below 1 g/kg, roughly a 50% reduction from existing designs. More information on the testing can be found here.

The fueling method proposed is ASTM E2817, which defaults to "manufacturer’s instructions", the method used in Europe. There are annexes for alternative crib and cordwood fueling methods. In-house testing at MHA is showing good repeatability with "manufacturer’s instructions" and cribs. Crib emissions appear to be roughly 50% higher than "manufacturer’s instructions" with cordwood.

Perhaps the biggest challenges presented by the practical aspects of the proposed standards lie with the fact that EPA doesn’t understand the unique operating characteristics of the masonry heater industry. For lack of adequate funding in addressing this tiny portion of the wood burning industry, regulators ended up copying much of the language from “AAA”, the wood stove portion of the P.S. 

For example, the P.S. refers to masonry heater Certified Model Lines, and includes a Licensing Restriction and a Storage Requirement.  The “model line” issue would require every heater built to be tested for emissions at an EPA certified lab.  The “licensing” restriction prevents MHA from certifying a heater and selling the plans for it.  The storage requirement would require a heater builder to keep a copy of every different heater built in a sealed container.  MHA is protesting all of these issues as unacceptable, since masonry heaters are typically very heavy, site built one-of appliances - similar to a masonry fireplace, except with dramatic performance improvements. Many heater masons have met the substantial requirements of the MHA Heater Mason Certification Program, and discussions need to take place with EPA on more feasible regulation compliance mechanisms for masonry heaters.

On a more hopeful note, as an alternative to certification testing, RRRR would permit a “validated computer model simulation program”.   A limited version of this is already used in Europe. It could provide a good way to certify a “family of units” defined as units with the same firebox dimensions and also gain acceptance of “substantially similar” heaters.  The technical committee has a project under way to design and verify a calculator to meet compliance under this clause.  This could be a key way to continue to offer custom designs to clients.

 Anyone building fewer than 15 masonry heaters per year would be granted a 5-year extension for compliance with the emissions limit.  It is a delay of standards that will be imposed for larger manufacturers when NSPS becomes law, likely in 2015.

  

(The views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Alliance for Green Heat. We have asked Norbert Senf and others to assist the Alliance in developing our comments to the EPA on masonry heaters.)