|Download visual guide here|
This easy-to-use guide provides photos of the most common safety issues found in wood stoves that should be checked by energy auditors - as well as other energy and hearth professionals. It can also be useful for homeowners. Coming soon is a checklist that will indicate the status of each item and whether it needs repair. The guide is broken down into what needs to be checked on the exterior of the stove, the interior of the stove, the exterior of the house - and many special circumstances. Some items are in grey areas of what an energy auditor is responsible for checking - such as the storage and moisture of the firewood - and we encourage states and counties with high rates of wood stove installations to engage in a more expansive audit.
The problem is that there is little evidence to indicate that stoves are being inspected in a meaningful and consistent way within many WAP programs. Most states use forms that provide many options to add detail about the inspection of a furnace, but little or none for wood stoves. Some states list wood stoves as a heating appliance and a few states, like Idaho, ask if the stove is “operable, failing or inoperable.” Furnaces on the other hand are turned on and have their flue gases tested, producing a written record on CO, PM, temperature efficiency and draft. This provides useful, objective indicators of the health of the furnace or boiler. There is no corollary data input options for wood stoves that would provide a written record showing the stove had received a meaningful or even minimal inspection.
In recent weeks, AGH did PowerPoint presentations to two important stakeholder groups: the DOE WAP Training Consortium and the National Residential Wood Smoke Workgroup. Both of
|Download PowerPoint here.|
these presentations were very productive and led to substantive follow-up work with many of the attendees. Kelly Cutchin who heads up the WAP Training Consortium has been particularly helpful as AGH navigates the bureaucracy that surrounds WAP standards, update, trainings, etc.
But while this project has gained a lot of traction and improvements are happening, we are still far away from our goal: changing the standards that the DOE uses to approve state work specification documents that have minimal attention to wood stoves. Most states are not living up to DOE requirements that all heating systems be inspected and repaired, as needed, or possibly replaced. One problem is that DOE regulations provide far more specificity about fossil fuel furnaces and boilers. For example, “WPN 19-4 Revised Energy Audit Attachments”, a key guidance document for the Weatherization Program, mentions boilers 19 times, furnaces 21 times, and wood stoves only 1 time. The result permeates the inspections and attention that each heater receives throughout the value chain. Thus, in the sections about repairing heating equipment, there is no guidance about how to repair a stove, while there is a long list of things relevant to boilers and furnaces. This continues year after year, despite the fact that there are more wood stoves than residential boilers in the United States (around 9 million homes are heated with oil, gas and propane boilers, while 10.1 million wood stoves provide primary or secondary heat nationwide).
There are plausible explanations for why WAP materials often have far more detail about inspecting and repairing furnaces compared to wood stoves. First, wood stoves are more often than not, a secondary heater, where furnaces are almost always primary heaters. Second, wood stoves are very infrequent in urban areas and in southern states. And third, there could be an implicit bias against wood stoves by agency officials who view them as a relic of the past and underestimate their numbers, safety issues and their importance for the rural poor.
The integration of wood heaters more fully in the WAP program ultimately should include changes to state “Standard Work Specifications” (SWS) documents, which are updated every 5 years to assure they reflect industry-accepted practices. Significant updates in the area of combustion safety occurred in the last 5 years but it is unclear if wood stoves were included in any significant way.
Sometimes, WAP documents say little more than a stove should be replaced if it shows “structural failure.” Some states seem to interpret that as having a crack in the heat exchanger, which in the case of a wood stove means a crack in the body of the stove. Maine is more restrictive and says replacement is "allowed only when there is a crack in the heat exchanger than may cause a carbon monoxide problem or a fire danger." Montana is unique and at the opposite extreme where non-EPA certified stoves are considered de facto "unsafe for program purposes."
Changes in these DOE funded programs will also influence the way that states, utilities and private companies conduct energy audits. When AGH polled its supporters who have had energy audits recently, a majority said their wood or pellet stove was completely ignored. Considering so many wood stoves are self-installed, this oversight is ripe for change.
Many thanks to everyone who has been working with AGH on his project, and special thanks to the CSIA, EPA and the WAP Trainers Consortium.
For further reading: