29 Republican House members sponsored the bill to repeal the new EPA heater regulations |
An energy bill passed the House of Representatives with an
amendment that repeals the EPA’s new residential wood heater regulations. The bill is not likely to pass the Senate and
President Obama vowed to veto it, if it comes to his desk.
(Feb. 2017 update: A similar bill, to repeal the EPA's wood heater regulations, was introduced again on Jan. 24, 2017 by Representative David Rouser and was referred to committee. Rouser represents a district on the coast of North Carolina, bordering South Carolina where very few people heat with wood.)
The 2016 passage of a bill that includes repealing the EPA’s residential wood heater regulations came as a surprise to most in the hearth industry, as well as in relevant state and federal agencies.
The 2016 passage of a bill that includes repealing the EPA’s residential wood heater regulations came as a surprise to most in the hearth industry, as well as in relevant state and federal agencies.
The bill, the North American Energy Security and
Infrastructure Act of 2015, H.R. 8,
was passed the House of December 3 with 240 Republican votes and 9
democrats. In addition to core issues in
bill, it repealed more than 20 energy and energy efficiency studies and programs,
including the EPA’s wood heater regulations which “shall have no force or effect
and shall be treated as if such rule had never been issued.”
The underlying bill, H.R.
1986, dubbed “the Stop EPA Overregulation of Rural Americans,” had 29
Republicans and no Democrat co-sponsors. The sponsors of the bill are almost all from
very rural parts of the country but members of Congress representing districts
with the highest levels of wood heating did not co-sponsor the bill. Most of the sponsors come from the southern
half of the United States and likely reflect their deep-seated opposition to
the EPA regulations generally.
Some of the sponsors of the bill refer to a “War on
Rural America.” One of the most vocal
advocates for the bill, Congressman Jason Smith (R-MO-8) repeatedly says the
EPA is regulating existing stoves, not just new ones. He said in a statement that there are 12
million stoves in 2.4 million homes, probably referring to the distinction between the estimated total of 12 million stoves and the 2.4 million homes that use wood or pellets as a primary heating source.
None of the industry groups representing sectors of
the hearth industry, including Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association (HPBA), Biomass
Thermal Energy Council (BTEC), and Pellet Fuels Institute (PFI), supported H.R.
1986, and it is unclear if any major company in the hearth industry supported the
bill. One small Michigan company, Eco-Fab
Industries that makes Eco-Maxx outdoor wood stoves which do not meet EPA
emission regulations and cannot be sold in the residential market after Jan. 1,
2016, supports the bill.
Hearth industry leaders indicate that they are
vested in broad parts of the NSPS and think that a judicial challenge to
certain parts is the best strategy for the solution they want.
HPBA had mounted a legislative push in 2014, urging
members of Congress to sponsor H.R. 4407
that would have prohibited the EPA from setting emission regulations lower than
4.5 grams per hour. (See AGH analysis of H.R. 4407) Some of the members
who supported H.R. 4407 became co-sponsors of H.R. 1986.
"Thousands of hard working industry, non-profit and agency experts put years of work into these regulations and they are truly a compromise of competing interests," said John Ackerly, President of the Alliance for Green Heat. "If no major stakeholder group is supporting the repeal of the regulations, why is the House of Representatives voting to do that?" Ackerly added.
"Thousands of hard working industry, non-profit and agency experts put years of work into these regulations and they are truly a compromise of competing interests," said John Ackerly, President of the Alliance for Green Heat. "If no major stakeholder group is supporting the repeal of the regulations, why is the House of Representatives voting to do that?" Ackerly added.
No comments:
Post a Comment