Updated: August 2020
In July 2017, New York became the first state in the country to set a minimum efficiency requirement in an ongoing pellet stove incentive program. The State will now only provide its $1,500 - $2,000 rebates to pellet stoves that are listed as 70% efficiency (HHV) or higher on the EPA’s list of certified stoves.
In September 2017, Maryland followed suit by offering larger incentives to stoves that have EPA listed efficiencies. It used to provides a $500 - $700 rebates to stoves with listed efficiencies and only $250 - $350 for stoves whose manufacturers have not yet disclosed their efficiency. As of February 1, 2020, it will only provide rebates to stoves that are listed at 70% efficiency or higher, matching the New York requirements.
Three other state programs have used efficiency values.
Oregon provided far higher rebates to stoves with higher efficiencies, but the program ended in 2018. Massachusetts’ annual change-out program, now lapsed, gives an additional rebate if the stove is listed at 65% or higher on the EPA
stove list. A lapsed southern Vermont change out required stoves to be listed at least 70% and be 2 grams an hour or less.
The change in New
York’s program, run by the New York State Energy and Research Development
Agency (NYSERDA), will limit the number of currently eligible pellet stoves to
about 30 models. Both New York and Maryland also requires
that pellet stoves emit no more than 2 grams an hour and that the home does not
have access to natural gas.
Last year, NYSERDA gave rebates to help install about 500
pellet stoves and the Maryland program averages about 800 pellet stoves per year. In both states, this is a significant boost to pellet stove sales. One of the biggest differences between the two
programs is that New York requires the trade-in of an old wood stove, unless
you are a low income household, but the Maryland program does not.
Part of the motivation by states and programs to require
that stoves have an efficiency listed on the EPA list
of stoves is to counter the widespread misinformation provided by manufacturers
to consumers. The Alliance for Green
Heat has consistently urged incentive and change out program managers to
include efficiency
and other best practices in program design.
This can be particularly problematic with lower income
families who may have tried to calculate savings when purchasing a pellet
stove, and are relying on manufacturer claims to get one of the higher
efficiency stoves. Incentive and change
out programs that give larger amounts to lower income households may be
helping those families purchase pellet stoves that are under 60% efficient,
saddling them with higher fuel costs for the lifetime of the appliance.
The New York program provides a rebate of $2,000 for lower
income households compared to $1,500 for others, and now protects them from misleading
information about efficiencies. A large portion of the NYSERDA rebate
recipients are low-income households. Both New York and Massachusetts qualify lower
income families if they earn less than 80% of median income. The Massachusetts program
was the first to use efficiency in a change out program, giving an additional $500 for stoves listed
at 65% or higher on the EPA list of certified stoves. Stoves made by
manufacturers who do not disclose actual, tested efficiencies to the public are
not eligible for the bonus in Massachusetts or for anything in New York.
Massachusetts also gives a higher rebate amount if you purchase an automated
wood stove.
Many New York retailers welcome the change, as they are often caught
between manufacturer efficiency claims and confused consumers. Colin Miller of Mallarney's Garden Center in North Bangor NY says he supports the changes because they help his customers save money "with more efficient stoves and its good for the environment."
The Maryland program initially chose not to exclude any stoves on the basis on efficiency, but simply to "encourage" consumers to choose a stove with a known efficiency value, even if it is a low one. "However, it is likely that the overwhelming majority of consumers who take the rebate will now choose stoves with listed efficiencies," said John Ackerly, President of the Alliance for Green Heat, who had been urging Maryland to make the change.
The main hearth industry association representing residential wood and pellet stoves, the Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association, does not recommend only incentivizing cleaner and more efficient stoves, and urges program managers to "incentivize replacing old stoves with anything that is cleaner burning." HPBA provided this statement about the changes in the NYSERDA program: “Unfortunately, there are some very clean, and potentially very efficient, pellet stoves that were certified before efficiency data was required by the new NSPS, but NYSERDA's program requirements exclude them from consumers' options.”
The Maryland program initially chose not to exclude any stoves on the basis on efficiency, but simply to "encourage" consumers to choose a stove with a known efficiency value, even if it is a low one. "However, it is likely that the overwhelming majority of consumers who take the rebate will now choose stoves with listed efficiencies," said John Ackerly, President of the Alliance for Green Heat, who had been urging Maryland to make the change.
The main hearth industry association representing residential wood and pellet stoves, the Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association, does not recommend only incentivizing cleaner and more efficient stoves, and urges program managers to "incentivize replacing old stoves with anything that is cleaner burning." HPBA provided this statement about the changes in the NYSERDA program: “Unfortunately, there are some very clean, and potentially very efficient, pellet stoves that were certified before efficiency data was required by the new NSPS, but NYSERDA's program requirements exclude them from consumers' options.”
For the New York program, of the approximately 30 pellet stoves that are 2 grams an
hour or less and 70% efficiency or more, there are a wide range of more expensive
brands carried by specialty hearth stores and very inexpensive ones carried by
big box stores. And more than a third
emit no more than 1 gram an hour. The
most efficient pellet stoves on the EPA list, from the Italian Extraflame line,
are 87% and 85% efficiency, but do not appear to be on the US market yet.
There are more than 500 models of wood and pellet stoves on the market and more than 150, or 25%, had listed efficiencies in summer 2017. Two years later, about 268 models, or about half of all stoves had listed efficiencies. As of the August 2020, under the New EPA rules, all 232 EPA certified stoves have listed efficiencies. In 2016 Alliance for Green Heat found that the average listed efficiency of a wood and pellet stove are the same - 73%. The average pellet stove with a listed efficiency emits 1.2 grams an hour and the average wood stove emits 2.6 grams as of June 2016. However, as of Aug. 2020, the median average is still 73%, but wood stoves only have 4 models, all catalytic, over 80% efficiency and pellet stoves have 16 models over 80% efficiency.
There are more than 500 models of wood and pellet stoves on the market and more than 150, or 25%, had listed efficiencies in summer 2017. Two years later, about 268 models, or about half of all stoves had listed efficiencies. As of the August 2020, under the New EPA rules, all 232 EPA certified stoves have listed efficiencies. In 2016 Alliance for Green Heat found that the average listed efficiency of a wood and pellet stove are the same - 73%. The average pellet stove with a listed efficiency emits 1.2 grams an hour and the average wood stove emits 2.6 grams as of June 2016. However, as of Aug. 2020, the median average is still 73%, but wood stoves only have 4 models, all catalytic, over 80% efficiency and pellet stoves have 16 models over 80% efficiency.
For consumer tips on how to choose a wood or pellet stove, this website
offers advice on stove selection, installation, rebates in your state and how
to know when a stove needs replacing.
No comments:
Post a Comment