Residential heating with wood and coal in the US and Europe (excerpts)

This blog contains excerpts from a very important and readable report published by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2015.  It is primarily from a health and policy perspective and is very valuable for North American as it provides more of a European perspective and is balanced in its approach. The entire 58-page report can be downloaded here. 

The report is particularly interesting as it hits on many themes that were considered or included in the 2015 EPA wood heater regulations, some of which will be litigated in 2017. It addresses best available technologies, indoor air quality, efficiency standards, stove changeout programs, black carbon, carbon neutrality, HEPA filters and many other issues. One of the overarching conclusions is that national policy should strongly favor pellet over cord wood appliances, a transition that has already occurred in parts of Europe, but not in the US.

Authors include experts from the US, Austria, Canada, Finland and Germany.  This publication was prepared by the Joint WHO/United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE).

The report describes the health effects of and policy options for dealing with residential heating with wood and coal in Europe and the United States. The results presented indicate that it will be difficult to tackle problems with outdoor air pollution in many parts of the world without addressing this source sector. National, regional and local administrations, politicians and the public at large need a better understanding of the role of wood biomass heating as a major source of harmful outdoor air pollutants (especially fine particles). This report is intended to help increase such an understanding. 

Executive Summary:

Measures are available to reduce emissions of solid fuels for residential heating in most places. Encouraging fuel switching (away from coal and other solid fuels) and use of more efficient heating technologies (such as certified fireplaces or pellet stoves) can reduce the emissions from residential wood and coal heating devices. Educational campaigns may also be useful tools to reduce emissions from residential solid fuel heaters.

Furthermore, filters may reduce health effects from indoor air pollution. Existing regulatory measures include ecodesign regulations and labels in the European Union (EU) and technology based emission limits in the United States of America and Canada. Financial fuel switching and technology changeout incentives – as well as targeted “no burn” days and ecolabelling – are other tools available to policy-makers.

p. 2. Residential heating with wood is a sector in which PM2.5 and BC emissions can potentially be reduced with greater cost– effectiveness than many other emission reduction options. Nevertheless, within Europe and North America only a few countries or states have set legal limits for minimum combustion efficiency or maximum emissions of PM and harmful gaseous compounds like CO and gaseous organic compounds (see section 6).

Coal:

p. 8. In the USA 55% of homes used coal/coke for space heating in 1940, but this fell to 12% in 1960, below 5% in the early 1970s and below 1% from the early 1980s (Schipper et al., 1985; United States Census Bureau, 2011).

One study estimates that reductions in the use of bituminous coal for heating in the USA from 1945–1960 decreased winter all-age mortality by 1% and winter infant mortality by 3%, saving nearly 2000 lives per winter month, including 310 infant lives (Barreca et al., 2014).

Based on this and evidence that indoor emissions from household combustion of coal are carcinogenic to humans, the latest WHO indoor air quality guidelines strongly recommend against the residential use of unprocessed or raw coal, including for heating (WHO, 2014a).

Infiltration of smoke into homes

p. 10. A household with wood-burning appliances is likely to be surrounded by other homes with wood-burning appliances, and wood burning also tends to aggregate temporally; thus, on cold evenings and nights most homes in the area may be burning wood.

Given that most wood burning occurs in cold locations where homes are well insulated, buildings are expected to have low infiltration (meaning that relatively small amounts of outdoor air pollution, including wood-burning smoke, enter the house and contribute to indoor air pollution), especially during the heating season.

In North America heating-season outdoor temperature is an important determinant of infiltration, and infiltration levels are generally lower in the heating than the non-heating season, when doors and windows are likely to be open more (Allen et al., 2012). In British Columbia the mean infiltration fraction of PM2.5 in winter was found to be 0.28, compared to 0.61 in summer, although infiltration factors for individual homes in winter ranged from 0.1–0.6 (Barn et al., 2008); another study reported similarly low mean infiltration levels of 0.32 Å}0.17 during the winter (Allen et al., 2009). Combustion of wood in residential areas and often under cold, calm meteorological conditions can nonetheless lead to high exposure compared to other pollution sources, owing to the principle of intake fraction.

  

Indoor pollution

Modern wood stoves and fireplaces, when operated according to the manufacturers’ instructions, release some PM and gaseous pollutants directly into indoor air, although in most cases the evidence for substantial indoor emissions from these modern stoves is very limited. With poor operation, poor ventilation or backdrafting, however, elevated concentrations of combustion products (such as PM, CO, VOCs, NOx and aldehydes) may result indoors. Acute CO poisoning, which can sometimes even be fatal, may occur due to indoor wood burning and infiltration of dirty ambient air), especially when ventilation of the wood-burning appliance is not managed properly.

Stove Change outs

p. 21. Such change-out initiatives have potential limitations. The Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) – the association of environment ministers from the federal, provincial and territorial governments – evaluated 12 stove exchange and educational efforts conducted in Canada and concluded that exchange programmes may have limitations relating to both the cost of new technologies and the long service life of appliances once installed. The assessment supported the use of regulation effectively to curb the sale of high-emission appliances. This approach is used in a number of Canadian provinces and American states.

The Canadian National Collaborating Centre for Environmental Health found that emissions standards (based on best available technologies) are needed to ensure that the newer devices installed through change-out programmes are among the cleanest available in the marketplace. Without these standards, change-out programmes may, in fact, be lost opportunities to install the cleanest available wood-burning devices, which will be in use for years to come.

The study also found that removal of conventional noncertified appliances (through exchanges, time limits or prior to the sale or transfer of a property) was the most effective strategy included in a model municipal by-law for mitigation of residential wood smoke (Environment Canada, 2006) (see “Other regulations and voluntary measures” in section 6). [Click for more on stove change out programs - editor.]

HEPA Filters

While household or individual-level strategies are not typically part of air quality management programmes, two studies from Canada indicate that inhome HEPA filtration might reduce health impacts from wood smoke. An initial single-blind randomized crossover study of 21 homes during winter, in an area affected by residential wood combustion as well as traffic and industrial sources, reported a mean 55% (standard deviation = 38%) reduction in indoor PM levels when HEPA filters were operated (Barn et al., 2008). Use of the HEPA filters reduced indoor PM2.5 and levoglucosan concentrations by 60% and 75%, respectively. [Click for more on HEPA filters - editor.]

Regulatory Emission Limits

p. 26. Over the past decade, the European Commission has worked towards the possibility of regulating solid fuel local space heaters and boilers, particularly those that use various forms of woody biomass fuel (wood logs, pellets and biomass bricks), to create proposed ecodesign emissions limits.

According to the Commission proposals, implementation of ecodesign standards would lead to significant reductions of PM2.5 emissions from solid fuel local space heaters and boilers compared to baseline projections. The draft regulation for solid fuel local space heaters2 states that in 2030 the proposed requirements for those products, combined with the effect of the energy labelling, are expected to save around 41 petajoules (0.9 million tonnes of oil equivalent (Mtoe)) per year, corresponding to 0.4 million tonnes of CO2. They are also expected to reduce

PM emissions by 27 kilotonnes per year,

Voluntary Measures

p. 30. The Wood Stove Decathlon, an initiative of the Alliance for Green Heat, was organized in 2013 to focus creativity and resources on designing next generation wood stoves. The main goal was to challenge teams of combustion engineers, engineering students, inventors and stove manufacturers to build wood stoves that are low-emission, high-efficiency, innovative and affordable, in a common process that may point to commercially attractive next generation stove production (Alliance for Green Heat, 2013). 

Policy Needs

p. 31 Any renewable energy or climate change related policies that support combustion of wood for residential heating need to consider the local and global ambient air pollution impacts and immediately promote the use of only the lowest emission or best available combustion technologies.

Legal regulations for wood combustion efficiency in new heating appliances are urgently needed throughout the world. These will both slow down the current rapid speed of global warming (relating to BC in fine particles and VOCs that promote ozone formation) and reduce the great burden of disease caused by wood combustion-derived particles (especially organic compounds carried by BC). Such regulations should include tight – but technically achievable – limits in particular for the primary emissions of particulate mass, gaseous hydrocarbons and CO from new boilers and heaters.

p. 32. As new wood-burning devices become more energy efficient and emit less pollution (especially PM), national governments need to prepare heater exchange regulations or voluntary programmes. Municipalities, counties and states should consider requiring heater exchanges at the time of home remodels or sales. In many cases, these regulations will be most successful if financial compensation is offered to assist with the cost of replacing old heaters with those meeting tight energy efficiency or emission limits regulations.

“No burn” areas are needed. Especially with current combustion technologies, it is important to define urban areas with dense populations and/or geographical features (such as valleys between mountains) where residential heating or cooking with small-scale appliances burning solid fuels (wood and coal) is not permitted at all or is at least limited to registered models of low-emission wood combustion devices. Residential heating with coal in small-scale appliances should also be permanently prohibited, at least in communities of developed countries, as should the use of wood log burners for central heating without a sufficiently large water tank (which otherwise leads to badly incomplete combustion and very large emissions).

Co-benefits for health and climate

As wood is burned ... carbon is released back to the atmosphere, not only as CO2 but in most household combustion also in the form of short-lived greenhouse pollutants such as BC, CO and VOCs including CH4. Thus, to be perfectly “carbon neutral”, wood fuel has to be not only harvested renewably but also combusted completely to CO2. For both climate and health purposes, the form these fuels’ carbon takes when it is released matters greatly, since BC and CH4 are both strongly climate-warming.

p. 34. A World Bank study found that replacing current wood stoves and residential boilers used for heating with pellet stoves and boilers and replacing chunk coal fuel with coal briquettes (mostly in eastern Europe and China) could provide significant climate benefits.

Another study coordinated by the United Nations Environment Programme and the World Meteorological Organization found that widespread dissemination of pellet stoves (in industrialized countries) could improve health, since these interventions lead to reductions in PM2.5.

If Arctic climate change becomes a focus of targeted mitigation action (because of threats from rising sea levels, for example), widespread dissemination of pellet stoves and coal briquettes may warrant deeper consideration because of their disproportional benefit to mitigating warming from BC deposition in the Arctic (UNEP & WMO, 2011). The World Bank found that replacement of wood logs with pellets in European stoves could lead to a 15% greater cooling in the Arctic (about 0.1 ÅãC). For Arctic nations the modeling strongly indicates that the most effective

BC reduction measures would target regional heating stoves for both climate and health benefits (Pearson et al., 2013).

Conclusions

p. 35. Given that residential wood combustion for heating will continue in many parts of the world because of economic considerations and availability of other fuels, an urgent need exists to develop and promote the use of the lowest emission or best available combustion technologies.

 It may be preferable in many cases to focus on making biomass-based home heating more efficient and less polluting rather than transitioning away from biomass to fossil fuels, given the climate change implications of using fossil fuel for heating.

EPA takes step towards a “green label” for wood and pellet heaters

Updated: Feb. 2, 2016

The EPA issued its long-awaited voluntary hangtag, which will help consumers identify the cleanest and most efficient burning wood and pellet heaters on the market. Manufacturers who make stoves and boilers that already meet the stricter 2020 emissions standards can use the hangtag.

The hangtag is a major step towards a “green” or “eco-label” for wood and pellet stoves for designating those stoves that emitted the least amount of smoke in the test lab. The efficiency of the stove must also be disclosed on the hangtag, which is usually more important information for consumers than emissions.

To date, there are three Lopi stoves that bear the hangtag - the Cape Cod Hybrid Fyre, the Flushwood Insert Hybrid Fyre and the Small Flushwood Hybrid Fyre, and a number of Blaze King stoves, the Katydid and four Garn Boilers.  The Alliance urges consumers to consider buying stoves that bear this label or that at least ones that disclose their actual efficiency on the list of EPA certified stoves.

Most European countries have had eco-labels for stoves for many years that have helped drive the market to exceed the minimum emission and efficiency standards.  The EPA designed this hangtag “to provide an incentive to manufacturers to meet the federal 2020 standards early” but the main industry stove association, the Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association (HPBA) is suing the EPA to prevent those stricter 2020 standards from taking effect.  It is still too early to tell if the big stove manufacturers may decline to use the hangtag because they may view it as a step toward the 2020 standards. Some companies are already taking steps to display the hangtag. 

The current emission standard for wood and pellet stoves is 4.5 grams per hour and the more stringent 2020 standard will be 2.0 grams per hour.  There are 76 models of pellet stoves on the EPA’s list of certified stoves and 48 of them are already under the 2 grams per hour limit, so 63% of pellet stove models already meet these 2020 standards and are eligible to display the consumer hangtag.  Eleven stoves, or 14% of all pellet stoves are already less than 1 gram per hour.

More than 2-dozen non-catalytic stoves and more than 2-dozen catalytic stoves are eligible to use the hangtag.  (Unlike pellet stoves, the emissions from wood stoves are not designed to estimate emissions from in-home use and homeowners will typically emit far more smoke than labs can achieve during a certification test.)

Among EPA certified wood and pellet boilers and furnaces, there are 72 models on the market and 38 of them meet the 2020 emissions standards and can use the hangtag.  Of those 38, only 5 of the models use cord wood achieve the 2020 standards but virtually all of the pellet units (33 out of 35) achieve the 2020 standards. Most of the certified pellet boilers are technologies imported from Europe and emit about one tenth of the emissions that certified cord wood boilers emit.

The development of the hangtag posed a number of concerns for the EPA, including whether they should list heat output in BTUs per hour, which is already included on the EPA’s list of certified stoves. The EPA decided to use a more general estimate of heat output, “Heating Area” in square feet,

estimated by the companies themselves, because BTU per hour claims have become too unreliable and prone to exaggeration.  In the past, the EPA did not require that test labs use actual efficiency numbers in heat output calculations and test labs have used a range of efficiency estimates to make stoves look more powerful that they actually are.

The hangtag also provides a box for companies to designate if they test with cordwood. For the first time ever, consumers can start to identify stoves that are designed and tested with the fuel that they will use.  No stove has been certified with cordwood yet and the ASTM cordwood test method is still in progress, but several companies are expected to test with cordwood in coming months.

The EPA is using the back of the hangtag to list important educational messages.  Among those messages is the strongest endorsement yet of certified pellets, a move that may irritate some pellet manufacturers who have been resisting getting their pellets certified.  The EPA says that “non-certified pellets may be high in ash content, low and energy output, and have impurities that could harm your families health.”  While some cheaper pellets have high ash content, low heat output and possibly even contain impurities, the quality of many uncertified pellet brands are on par with those that are certified and some of the highest quality pellets are not certified.  

The EPA’s willingness to strongly endorse pellet certification comes at a time when the main certifying body, the Pellet Fuel Institute (PFI), is also suing the EPA over pellet certification issues. 

Among wood and pellet boilers, there are 72 models on the market and 38 of them meet the 2020 emissions standards and can use the hang-tag.  Of those 38, only 5 of the models use cord wood achieve the 2020 standards and can use the hang-tag but virtually all of the pellet units (33 out of 35) achieve the 2020 standards. Most of the certified pellet boilers are technology imported from Europe and emit about one tenth of the emissions that the cord wood boilers emit.

The success of the EPA’s consumer hangtag, like many eco labels, may hinge on branding and how recognizable the hangtag is to consumers.  If the EPA, states, and non-profits put resources into promoting the hangtag, consumers will be more likely to ask for it and base their purchasing decisions on it.  The first companies to start using the hangtag could see a boost in their sales and it could put pressure on the mainstream companies to use the hangtag, if they aren’t already.

“This hangtag will help consumers not only choose cleaner stoves, but also to choose companies committed to making cleaner stoves and to releasing verified efficiency values to their consumers,” said John Ackerly, President of the Alliance for Green Heat.  “If the stove you buy today already meets the 2020 standards, the parts and service for that stove are more likely to be available 5-10 years from now, when you need it,” Ackerly added.

#  #  #

Visit the EPA's page on the voluntary hang-tag.  For more on problems with EPA listings on Btu output per hour, the lack of disclosure of stove efficiencies, the EPA's 2020 emission standards for stoves and boilers and PFI pellet certification scheme.

How a Green Label Transformed Sales of Wood Stoves in France

Alliance for Green Heat, December 3, 2012 - By the year 2000, the French wood stove industry knew it had to change. Wood smoke from older wood stoves was becoming a greater problem and the R&D needed to make much cleaner appliances was lagging. Industry also needed to work better with the French government to show their technology deserved tax credits. The result was Flamme Verte, a green label recognizing the cleanest stoves.

France set a goal to have 9 million homes heated with wood by 2020, a 50% increase over the 6 million homes that used wood at the time, using the same amount of fuel because the new appliances were so much more efficient than the older ones.

Today, the French wood stove industry is one of the most robust in Europe, selling more than 450,000 units per year. Germany follows with around 400,000. As of 2010, the French industry had created 21,130 jobs and was estimated to hit 38,000 by 2012. The industry estimates that the sector represents a potential source of more than 100,000 jobs by 2020 if the goals are reached.

To read the complete French stove industry report, click here.